lunatic
11-09-2008, 02:38 PM
Sail design at http://www.boatdesign.net/forums/boat-design/sail-design-trim-camber-twist-leading-edge-23524.html has been built as in attached drawing and photos, and sailed on a Sunfish hull. Surprising stable, perhaps due to gaff piercing sleeve through Velcro closing slot flattening camber aloft, but elsewhere good variation in camber and twist. Vang and downhaul can pull max camber forward and flatten aft trailing section without battens, mainsheet sufficient in light air.
Sail cobbled together from scrap with later sections glued in to increase lower to mid draught, creating hard spots and creases, but sails better than it looks. Sailed in 20-30 mph, enough wind to repeatedly knock down a Laser, could point as high tracking it but conditions not conducive for comparative sailing. On a beam reach, flattening and untwisting sail to telltales had best planning I have ever had on a Sunfish, right on the edge of rudder capacity. Never capsized in 3 hours of sailing, always felt in control. Rig is app 75 sq ft with center of area 9 ft above deck, highly cambered Sunfish is 80 at 5 ft and would have had high down time in similar conditions.
Choice of wide sleeve over total double skin was for ease of fabrication and modifications, but the ubiquitous Tom Speer's "Double Skin Sails" at http://www.boatdesign.net/forums/showthreads.php?=603 argues for extended sleeve, which has benefit of less weight, but why less windward pressure for double?
Tackable drooping D section built as in drawing. Upwash forward facing lee surface is highlighted by on edge sunlight in photo B, windward side in C. D shows rotation wheel, friction made lines impractical, unloading rig and tee hook work, but makes tacking an event. Seems close winded repeatedly tacking through a mooring field. Is the D section worth it? The power coefficient of a similar sail fabric bladed wind turbine rotor increases 5 fold from round to drooping D section leading edge and produced higher L/D for wind tunnel tested sail wings, Princeton Report NTIS PB 259898. Yet 'SoftWing' Sails at http://marine.bdg.com.au/spitfire_features.html section AA shows round leading edge?
I modified rig with half wishbone gaff outside of sleeve and generous luff round at leading edge of sleeve resulting in wider range of camber. Still flattens for high winds though 2 windward mid level luff telltales tend to point up sailing upwind, might be separation bubble from excessive camber behind round mast? I also removed sheet metal D section due to damage and for ease of tacking. All this makes one appreciate incremental development over decades, but seems enough potential in this primitive prototype for a fresh cut sail, any suggestions for improvements? The rig will drop into a Laser for comparative sailing, but with falling temperatures, it may be awhile before I find a comparative sailor.
Sail cobbled together from scrap with later sections glued in to increase lower to mid draught, creating hard spots and creases, but sails better than it looks. Sailed in 20-30 mph, enough wind to repeatedly knock down a Laser, could point as high tracking it but conditions not conducive for comparative sailing. On a beam reach, flattening and untwisting sail to telltales had best planning I have ever had on a Sunfish, right on the edge of rudder capacity. Never capsized in 3 hours of sailing, always felt in control. Rig is app 75 sq ft with center of area 9 ft above deck, highly cambered Sunfish is 80 at 5 ft and would have had high down time in similar conditions.
Choice of wide sleeve over total double skin was for ease of fabrication and modifications, but the ubiquitous Tom Speer's "Double Skin Sails" at http://www.boatdesign.net/forums/showthreads.php?=603 argues for extended sleeve, which has benefit of less weight, but why less windward pressure for double?
Tackable drooping D section built as in drawing. Upwash forward facing lee surface is highlighted by on edge sunlight in photo B, windward side in C. D shows rotation wheel, friction made lines impractical, unloading rig and tee hook work, but makes tacking an event. Seems close winded repeatedly tacking through a mooring field. Is the D section worth it? The power coefficient of a similar sail fabric bladed wind turbine rotor increases 5 fold from round to drooping D section leading edge and produced higher L/D for wind tunnel tested sail wings, Princeton Report NTIS PB 259898. Yet 'SoftWing' Sails at http://marine.bdg.com.au/spitfire_features.html section AA shows round leading edge?
I modified rig with half wishbone gaff outside of sleeve and generous luff round at leading edge of sleeve resulting in wider range of camber. Still flattens for high winds though 2 windward mid level luff telltales tend to point up sailing upwind, might be separation bubble from excessive camber behind round mast? I also removed sheet metal D section due to damage and for ease of tacking. All this makes one appreciate incremental development over decades, but seems enough potential in this primitive prototype for a fresh cut sail, any suggestions for improvements? The rig will drop into a Laser for comparative sailing, but with falling temperatures, it may be awhile before I find a comparative sailor.