samh
11-12-2003, 05:36 PM
http://www.everesthorizontal.com/gallery/EH_and_the_Brooklyn_Bridge.jpg
I am wondering about the nature of existence.. no, thats not it.. oh yes, the combination of a deck mounted boom and one of these very tall cabin tops, as in the image of Everest Horizontal above.
The great volume of the cabin top would be a benefit in a roll over, and on a much smaller boat (mini?) perhaps would even provide the much sought after and somewhat overrated standing head room. Deck mounting the boom takes the load off of the mast and standing rigging.
What is the trade off? The angle of the boom to the mast (forgive me, I can't seem to tell my leech from my luff) seems a bit extreme, something like 90 degrees on a standard rig to what, 35 degrees here? The sail cut would have to be for lack of better understanding, non-standard, so that the boom could tack across the high cabin.
Why not?
S
I am wondering about the nature of existence.. no, thats not it.. oh yes, the combination of a deck mounted boom and one of these very tall cabin tops, as in the image of Everest Horizontal above.
The great volume of the cabin top would be a benefit in a roll over, and on a much smaller boat (mini?) perhaps would even provide the much sought after and somewhat overrated standing head room. Deck mounting the boom takes the load off of the mast and standing rigging.
What is the trade off? The angle of the boom to the mast (forgive me, I can't seem to tell my leech from my luff) seems a bit extreme, something like 90 degrees on a standard rig to what, 35 degrees here? The sail cut would have to be for lack of better understanding, non-standard, so that the boom could tack across the high cabin.
Why not?
S