View Full Version : Cutfinger Watercraft - world's fastest rough water craft?
kach22i
11-29-2007, 01:32 PM
Just found this, don't know if it's been posted before.
Cutfinger Watercraft......mock-up
http://www.warboats.org/future2.htm
world fastest rough water craft
http://www.warboats.org/images/jpg/LeeBoats/lee1.jpg
http://www.warboats.org/images/jpg/LeeBoats/hswc1.jpg
http://www.warboats.org/images/jpg/LeeBoats/boat8%20001.jpg
http://www.cutfingerwatercraft.com/
http://www.cutfingerwatercraft.com/images/P8210323-webpage.jpg
This concept uses a radical shift from the standard types of propulsion. We are using a new patented type of propulsion that will increase hull speed. Engineers have projected the watercraft may be able to sustain 100 mph in sea swells of 20 feet or higher.
http://www.cutfingerwatercraft.com/images/P8210299-Email.jpg
kach22i
11-29-2007, 01:41 PM
http://www.cutfingerwatercraft.com/PressEnterprise2.htm
Lee said his design could potentially allow the Cutfinger to reach speeds of 70 mph in 20-foot swells by slicing through the waves like a knife. The secret is technology that allows water to be sucked up through both sides of the hull, like a giant water pump, lessening the water's resistance.
http://www.pe.com/imagesdaily/2006/11-07/hlee07adib_300.jpg
Fanie
11-29-2007, 03:37 PM
Looks like the offspring between a submarine and a powerboat !
kach22i
11-29-2007, 03:47 PM
Upon a quick read of the patent it seems that the intake path/pressure for a mid-mounted water turbine helps hold the craft down to the surface thereby preventing it fron heaving up on the crest (or dip) of a wave.
There is something called a "Custer Wing" (or Channel Wing) which causes lift on a similar principle.
http://www.custerchannelwing.com/
http://www.custerchannelwing.com/images/plane5b.jpg
kerosene
12-05-2007, 09:32 AM
I will believe it when I see it. It is hard for me to believe that backyard engineering could produce something that can travel on/through water 100mph safely.
The photo series of the mock up building is less than convincing imo. Then again I can be a pessimist when it comes to revolutionary things.
http://www.cutfingerwatercraft.com/images/MockUp_018.jpg
http://www.cutfingerwatercraft.com/images/MockUp_027.jpg
http://www.cutfingerwatercraft.com/images/update03_May_01_2004.jpg
http://www.cutfingerwatercraft.com/images/update02_May_01_2004.jpg
http://www.cutfingerwatercraft.com/images/MockUp_033.jpg
http://www.cutfingerwatercraft.com/images/1-8-05%20update%2006.jpg
Fanie
12-05-2007, 09:47 AM
It is hard for me to believe that backyard engineering could produce something
:eek: Why not ? It's every 'backyard engineer's ' choice how professional or how un-professional he wants to do anything. Exactly where is the line between so called 'pro - ' and 'backyard' ... ie, when do you cross over ?
yipster
12-05-2007, 12:57 PM
recently i did read bout blown wings, iow a wing that wind is blown by a engine
has stol capability and over triple the lift of a sucking slatflap but in combination
with a duct and non planar wing can have CL26? dont know but doubt that
it was some interesting reading tho with planty more questions sprouting
i think the story's has some merrit, i'm by no means an expert tho.
Willallison
12-05-2007, 05:05 PM
I wonder what's going to stop it from continuing on a downward trajectory at 100 mph....
I gather that those little "pectoral fins" are to correct direction either upwards or downwards, but at those sort of speeds, I would have thought that typical human reaction times could result in a pretty wild ride.
Still - always happy to be proved wrong - no doubt they've considered such stuff....
Fanie
12-05-2007, 05:12 PM
In most instances where crytical occurences can happen which may be too fast for human control use is made of a micro processor to either control, limit or prevent certain things... similar to your car's ABS brakes.
masalai
12-05-2007, 05:37 PM
And cars still crash unexpectedly with monotonous regularity, and they are supposedly "professionally" made and designed by "highly qualified" engineers.
Much like some software writers who were "paid by the line" hence the term "Bloatware" and excessively cumbersome programs?
Then add to the mix, "suck it and see" modifyiers who crave to convert their small car into a raging 1000hp monster and put it on the public roads.
At least the oceans are a little bit bigger a playground to experiment in and justify the necessity for Coastguard in a way and frequency not expected. Makes good U-tube though He he.....
Fanie
12-05-2007, 06:01 PM
Well, you have to keep in mind the car is still under the human's control. Without ABS there would probably many more accidents, you cannot however expect the ABS to prevent an idiot from driving over a cliff or stop on the other side of another car... but it does help for optimum braking on poorish road surfaces.
Another simple electronic gadget that prevents us from buggering ourselves up is the earth leakage protection... since we react too slow to disconnect ourselves when touching live power the earth leakage does that for us.
Won't prevent the short circuit you made with the recent re-wiring, but it will keep you alive to pay for the damages the short caused :D
Then add to the mix, "suck it and see" modifyiers who crave to convert their small car into a raging 1000hp monster and put it on the public roads.
You have them there too ? It's quite funny how many of these young guys are going to heat their cars up... 1300 City Golf :eek: and the performance... sounds like they will run down any V8.
kerosene
12-05-2007, 06:50 PM
:eek: Why not ? It's every 'backyard engineer's ' choice how professional or how un-professional he wants to do anything. Exactly where is the line between so called 'pro - ' and 'backyard' ... ie, when do you cross over ?
I think your quote of my post is a little unfair the way you chop it.
I do have faith in clever individuals coming up with new solutions and sometimes to see what has been missed by everyone. There definitely are examples of great inventions by ordinary people.
At the same time there are a lot of inventors who make revolutionary claims purely based on ideas without real data or research to back their assumptions. I think that it is quite challenging to have a boat that can dart through waves 100mp without hurting the pilot or disintegrating the boat.
The pictures of the prototype building seem like the process is a little too intuitive or spontaneous to result in revolutionary engineering feat.
Am happy to be proven wrong and all the better if the concept works.
h
Fanie
12-05-2007, 07:07 PM
Kerosene... I can see you're burning up about this :D
I think your quote of my post is a little unfair the way you chop it.
Sorry if it offended you, at the time I read it it seemed a bit generalized... There's quite a few ie boats I saw that looks pretty well done by first time builders... they're back yard mechanics so to speak...
The pictures of the prototype building seem like the process is a little too intuitive or spontaneous to result in revolutionary engineering feat.
May be so... could be the guy had a couple of bucks to throw around and this idea to put up the first record for something we may remember him by. If he's reacable he could even comment on the forum if someone asks him to.
kerosene
12-05-2007, 07:39 PM
oh no no - not offended at all. not a big deal. I hate the way the forum speak doesn't carry out tone very well.
Just discussing :)
FAST FRED
12-06-2007, 06:12 AM
Were the Wright Brothers Amateur backyard builders or Pros?
FF
Fanie
12-06-2007, 07:19 AM
Yeah ! And the Tytanic was built by Pro's, the Arc by amateurs... That's it, where do one get Arc plans... without the animals ?
Manie B
12-06-2007, 08:43 AM
I am also an ark builder :D - luv this thread :cool: check out my concoction :!:
Fanie
12-06-2007, 03:10 PM
So Manie, are you from Pretoria or Tshwane (City of the Apes) ?
Manie B
12-06-2007, 11:43 PM
Ja lekker ou boet - dis Vrydag en die bouers is amper met vakansie. :) You must remember that me at 54 years old and with new polticians coming and going i cant keep up with the name changes in our "kantry" points less excersise.
The next name might be ZUMA SHOWER EKAYA :confused:
Manie B
12-06-2007, 11:44 PM
Centurion
Ekaiztea
12-07-2007, 05:55 AM
Hi everybody:
A year ago, my company recives a brand new cruising passengers ship, 1700 passengers capability. As usually, a testing creew was sent to the ships yard for receiving and testing the boat. We were engaged almost 3 months in that busines before setting the ship in service line. The whole ship has computer assisted controls, electronic sensors, automated safety systems กกก She looks like the Entherprise spaceship. Was completly espectacular. But ..... we had, in the first two months of truly work of her, two blackouts. She sweetches ALL systems OFF by herself. We got not under command, with no main engines and no emergency systems, two times in two months. The second time, we had to ask for tug boats 50 miles away from the Canary Islands. Fortunately weather was fine. The end of the story is that all automated controls were substituted by classical controls, and that our particular main control computer (We named it HAL-9000 ) was only able to assist but not to control anything.
Note: Finnaly we found where was the problem, but that's another story.
I don't trust in computers for critical decissions when the responsability is mine.
Best regards
Guillermo
12-08-2007, 06:22 PM
Txon,
was the vessel built in Vigo?
Cheers.
Ekaiztea
12-12-2007, 07:04 AM
Yes, How did you know ???? Ha ha ha ha ha
Guillermo
12-13-2007, 02:16 AM
Well, I'll have to tell my friends in Barreras to take more care of the systems aboard...! ;)
(Note: I use to attend most of the Barreras launchings, so maybe we can even have met -without knowing- there).
Cheers
View Full Version : Cutfinger Watercraft - world's fastest rough water craft?