| ||||
|
#2026
| ||||
| ||||
| read it sounded to me like it was just one disgruntled dissenter ( this Pope person ) who is doing all the disclaiming thing is most of the changes we are seeing are happening "faster" than the predictions called for as for the weather in Brittan I believe it was predicted that the UK would cool down with the slowing in the gulf stream and shortly after that winters in western Europe would also become harsher that slowing caused of course by freshwater entering the marine thermohaline system due to exesive melting brought on by you guessed it kids global warming course I read all that a while ago so there may be addendum's Im not aware of but something to chew on best B oh and yes the overall effect of global warming is cooling resulting in an ice age with the initial stages being the slowing and collapse of the thermohaline system not the prolonged extreme high temps that are often associated with the misinformed the higher temps are a short term obvious result the longer term result is a ice age and a big one can you say snowball earth theory hows that for the sky is falling kids "alarming" isnt it best B |
|
#2027
| ||||
| ||||
| In October 2005 there was an abrupt and sustained lowering of the Ap Solar Magnetic Index. The sun has been running at a lower plateau of the Ap index after that event and has not recovered. There is a good correlation between the Ap Index at minimum and the amplitude of the following solar cycle. This Index may have a value of 3 in late 2009, this leading to a very weak solar cycle 24 (when it appears!). Read more at: http://wattsupwiththat.com/2009/02/1...ion/#more-5568 |
|
#2028
| ||||
| ||||
| Quote:
Think of this government largess as a investment in our country. If you look to historical acts for comparison you may find that this is not a wasted effort. Take a look to the Servicemen's Readjustment Act of 1944 - the GI bill. This could be viewed as the last gasp of the New Deal government investments in our economy of that period. The wisdom of this spending is abundantly clear. Here is a bit on the subject: "The 1944 Servicemen’s Readjustment Act, or G.I. Bill of Rights, attracts universal praise as one of the most significant pieces of social legislation of the twentieth century for its redeeming effects on both the national economy and its beneficiaries." "In 1988, congress was interested in discovering if the GI Bill of Rights had helped or hurt the economy, and how much it had. The Congressional Subcommittee of Education and Health of the Joint Economic Committee did a study of the effects of the GI Bill of Rights to answer this outstanding question. They found that it caused an extra $35 billion (1952 dollars) to be created over the next 35 years. It also brought in, in this 35 post-war period, an extra $12.8 billion (1952 dollars) of taxes. Overall, they found that for every $1 invested, there were $6.9 in return. "The GI Bill of Rights gave many veterans a free education and cheap home-loans. This helped in the economy in more than one way. Not only did it prevent a flood of workers from creating a post-war depression, as had happened after World War One, it also created a more productive economy. Veterans with an education could make more money and helped to build a more sound economy than could have ever been done without their educations." The "Federal-Aid Highway Act of 1956" worked towards building our interstate highways. This government investment had profound effects on our growth. The tension we see across the isle on these issues reflects a difference in approach. To my mind this difference is characterized by short term stimulus on one hand and investment on the other. The division is not so wide as the histrionics of the debate would suggest. 60/40 vs 40/60 investment/stimulus vs stimulus/investment more or less... One might conclude that even this difference is imaginary if the hundreds of billions Bush extended in failed short term stimulus efforts are included in the accounting. |
|
#2029
| ||||
| ||||
| interesting stuff if we have a economy with say 11 trillion in us dollars around the world and we add 4 trillion which is what they are saying this will probably cost in the end how can it not devalue each dollar dont get me wrong I liked the previous but what percentage of the ttl money in the economy did the GI bill add to the ttl as apposed to what percentage we are talking about adding today I agree we need to spend on infrastructure and education big times they have been neglected way to long but not on bailing out banks and biz which is were about 600 billion has already disappeared to with no appreciable effect that is already twice what they are saying is in the bill for infrastructure, education and energy combined infrastructure 120 billion education 100 billion renewable energy 30 billion 212 billion in tax breaks ( imaginary money gov isnt going to print this up its just that they arent collecting it from the population ) 267 billion for unemployment benefits and food stamps |
|
#2030
| ||||
| ||||
| HAHAHHahhahahahahahaa been months,,, and my birds are still a WAY better investment then anything else,, hahahahahaha ,, last month i sold over 1200 baby chicks,,, @ $3 a piece,, at the cost to me of $.80 a piece..... hmmmmm hahahhaa ![]()
__________________ hehe ,,,,,Jim------> |
|
#2031
| |||
| |||
| Quote:
It was after all, just a THEORY that some scientists used at one time to account for pelagic mixing of hot and cold waters. Nothing more than a theory, now discredited. Jimbo |
|
#2032
| ||||
| ||||
| hiyas Jimbo Boston bntii Guillermo Rick ![]() glad ta see ya allz again,, and that all is well hehe ![]()
__________________ hehe ,,,,,Jim------> |
|
#2033
| ||||
| ||||
| hey Jim good investment them little birds...? ![]() I have been looking all over the eastern shore of Maryland for a bit of land- on occasion there is a property listed with the whole set up in place- buildings birds- contract with purdue.. the whole shooting match. Not too much $ it seems as well for the size of lot offered and all that stuff in place... Of course the whole place is going under water if jimbo is wrong about the AGW thingamajiggy ![]() |
|
#2034
| ||||
| ||||
| Quote:
to keep on the subject,,, bugs are getting way worse here,,,, climate change ????????? ![]()
__________________ hehe ,,,,,Jim------> |
|
#2035
| ||||
| ||||
| Sob... Hello... The old man on the river in his shanty has us all beat... Yup... SH. |
|
#2036
| ||||
| ||||
| Quote:
![]()
__________________ hehe ,,,,,Jim------> |
|
#2037
| ||||
| ||||
| Cheers Much... Hello... Hope you are well - stay to topic though - this is a psuedo SCIENCE thread - oh ****... I would like you to check in on - http://www.boatdesign.net/forums/ope...use-26074.html - as it gets going... Happy St. Valentines Day my friend... Lots of burps and farts... SH. |
|
#2038
| ||||
| ||||
| Hear you jim- not on board exactly with the SHTF way of thinking but do want to get a little elbow room in the next couple of years. Feel trapped- its like all those godzila flicks. It's the bus full of people that always gets snatched up and tossed up in the air by the big lizard |
|
#2039
| ||||
| ||||
| I read it just that I was laughing so hard at the idea that tens of thousands of scientists and hundreds of years of countless sailors working those thermohaline currents and trades were just imagining it all I guess I just didnt take it seriously basically you found someone who is denying the gulf stream exists or that the southern ocean circulation is real or the Atlantic current ( canary islands ) the Labrador current all are well known and studied no way there existence is in question why they move, how fast they move, where they move from and were they move to, is well understood ![]() also if you are willing to consider the circulation then it becomes obvious why the arctic is melting faster than the antarctic kinda lends credence to the hole circulation theory when there is corroborating evidence like that |
|
#2040
| |||
| |||
| Nobody's denying the freakin' Gulfstream exists! That's yet another example (of sooo many) of the absolute silliness that comes from the mouth (keyboard ) of 'Boston'! What he (and others) are saying is that these currents ARE NOT driven by salinity/temperature differences, which is what the 'thermo/haline' theory suggests.Furthermore, these currents ARE NOT the main mixing forces of the cold and warm waters, as was once believed. This is important because the implication of the idea that there is a significant thermo/haline circulation, and this is the main mixing mechanism for warm and cold water, is that the pelagic system is yet another unstable equilibrium that could potentially be upset by climate change, and go 'off the rails', never to return. Now the main mixing mechanism is said to be eddies, which are ultimately wind driven. Jimbo |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
| |
Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| How much will the C of G change? | Gene H | Diesel Engines | 6 | 03-02-2007 11:30 AM |
| Somebody Please help with impeller change! | SC Hartwell | Outboards | 2 | 01-14-2007 01:44 PM |
| Change My Skeg? | mcody2005 | Boat Design | 1 | 11-06-2006 12:45 AM |
| How about a change of pace? | Handtool | Fiberglass and Composite Boat Building | 11 | 09-14-2006 09:42 AM |
| Career Change | preaser | Education | 2 | 10-07-2004 11:29 AM |