| ||||
|
#1
| |||
| |||
| Wave height/swell height are they additive? |
|
#2
| |||
| |||
| Yes, could be |
|
#3
| ||||
| ||||
| Quote:
__________________ Craig Cavanaugh Silver King Custom Marine No shoes, no shirt, no problem! |
|
#4
| |||
| |||
| Actually, no. It is important to note that while both local wind generated waves (the sea) and remotely generated storm waves (the swell) are reported, they considered and measured seperately. This is because they effect different parts of the frequency regime. Wind waves (except in storms) tend to less than 6-7 seconds, swell tends to be greater than 9-10 seconds (this is not a hard and fast rule, it has a lot to do with spectral analysis of the measured seaway). For small vessels you are woried about the energy in waves, for offshore/large structures, you are worried about the energy in swell. While they both contribute to the power spectrum, and therefore contribute to the maximum wave height, the values reported cannot be mathematically summed, i.e. the H1/3 sea + the H1/3 swell does not equal the H1/3 of the seaway. This is because the sea is proportional to the sqrt of the area in the power spectrum that corresponds to the local sea, while swell height is is proportional to the sqrt of the area in the power spectrum that is generated by remote swell. To put numbers to it: H1/3 waves = 4*sqrt(Mw) and H1/3 swell = 4*sqrt(Ms) If the waves are 8 ft and the swell is 4 feet, then this implies that Mw = 4 and Ms =1 so M0=Mw+Ms=5 and H1/3 for the total seaway is 4*sqrt(5) =8.9...NOT 12. There is a lot of math behind this and if you want some references I can give them. However, note that it is M0, not Mw or Ms that determines the maximum expected wave height. while the average of the highest 1/3 waves (H1/3) is not increased that much, because it multiplied by the probability density of maxima (eyes glazed over yet?) of only 4, but, by the time you get to H 1/100 the multiplier is 6.5, by H1/10000 8.9. Therefore the expected wave height for evey 100th wave is 14.5 feet and for every 10000th wave 20 ft, both of which are greater than 12. EDIT: Netjaws...If you are at the USNA...go ask Bhattacharyya....he wrote a book on that stuff. |
|
#5
| ||||
| ||||
| Uh...Yeah, that's what I meant. ![]()
__________________ Craig Cavanaugh Silver King Custom Marine No shoes, no shirt, no problem! |
|
#6
| |||
| |||
| My calibrated sea eyes only see ground swells and wind waves. Alone or stacked one on top of the other. What do YOUR eyes see at sea. |
|
#7
| |||
| |||
| Quote:
On the whole however, the concept of "Sea State" is very poor and must be handled very carefully in design. To make a design contract for "must operate in SS3" is just opening the door for confusion. An example conversation I was in.... Contractor (who made the system): "The system is not woking, it must be greater than SS3 out there" Master Chief Diver (who will risk his life in the system): "What! #$%#$!! It's DFC out there. Your system is AFU'd" Me (technical observer): "Well...... it's actually about SS1 and a half, but there is a 2 foot 13 second swell" Contractor: "A thriteen second swell!!! That means it's SS7!! Of course it's not going to work!!!" MCD and Me:" Bwaaaahahahahah!......" |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
| |
Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Solomon Technologies - "Electric Wheel" electric motor propulsion systems | lockhughes | Hybrid | 228 | 10-12-2011 05:00 PM |
| Hull speed | Mike D | Boat Design | 33 | 02-27-2011 02:20 AM |
| the egotistical quest for an expensive thrill | deepkeeler | Boat Design | 179 | 08-31-2006 10:32 PM |
| Option One - how big | Willallison | Option One | 43 | 12-20-2005 06:44 AM |
| University project: Multihull wave making drag | leegrace | Boat Design | 16 | 10-20-2005 12:21 AM |