| ||||
|
#451
| |||
| |||
| Seeing that thing coming at you would be like being in the path of a 30 m wave. From an article about that incident: "To give additional perspective, consider that this particular bear, standing on its hind legs, could walk up to an average single story house and look over the roof, or walk up to a two story house and look in the bedroom windows." |
|
#452
| ||||
| ||||
| And yet they lost the Super Bowl. ![]() http://mkmagazin.almanacwhf.ru/mk_other/ok...9002_sla_89.htm ![]() http://mkmagazin.almanacwhf.ru/mk_other/ok...02_sla_89_3.htm |
|
#453
| |||
| |||
| There was and is controversy over Langley and his work. From what I've been able to determine from a variety of sources, the controversy and the bad press you mentioned arose over the last series of flights of his aircraft, the unsuccessful flights of 1903. Those were funded with a government grant reported as either $50,000 or $70,000 (equivalent to hundreds of millions today), which meant automatically that a large portion of the funds went to hire beauraucrats to administer the funds, and that every flight was made in full view of the press, who, as we know, are very interested in accurate reporting of facts, with no interest in promoting bad news over good. (Sorry, I had to take a break to get a prybar to remove me tongue from me cheek) Prior to his much publicized final flight program, based on the houseboat mounted catapult in the Potomac, Langley successfully flew a series of powered airplanes at distances over 1000 ft, beginning in 1891, using his own funds. These were unmanned but powered by compact steam engines. The houseboat launcher was for safety, in the belief that a pilot would have a better chance to survive a water crash than on land. Good thing he was right, as both 1903 flights ended about 50 ft from the launcher. According to many sources, one of the key reasons the Wright's plane succeeded in piloted flight while Langley failed was their recognition that there needed to be a way for the pilot to control the aircraft. Langley believed the aircraft should be inherently stable, while the Wrights likely recognized that Mr Murphy would often ride as a passenger, so the pilot needed to be able to make corrections at any time. Now I'm tired from all that thinking and typing.....zzzzz. |
|
#454
| |||
| |||
| Super Stalker... you can't make this stuff up! New candidate for the Guiness Book: the first astronaut to be charged with a felony. This is a nice diversion from the real troubles of the world: http://blogs.usatoday.com/ondeadline...ove_trian.html I particularly liked her comments, "I brought the ...gun to entice her to talk with me" and, "that was stupid" (squirting pepper spray into the other woman's face when she wouldn't be "enticed" into having a little chat). |
|
#455
| |||
| |||
|
#456
| ||||
| ||||
| From Model Boat Book (1948), Chapter Thirteen A JETEX POWER HYDROPLANE http://jetex.org/cja/pages-more/arti...rojet-mbb.html ![]() ![]() Quote:
![]() |
|
#457
| ||||
| ||||
| Flugelrad http://images.google.com/images?hl=e...h+Images&gbv=2 This site is pretty complete: http://www.eyepod.org/Nazi-Disc-Photos.html They say BMW made them, what do you think? Thrust vectoring just like the F-22. http://www.fantastic-plastic.com/BMWFlugelradV2Page.htm ![]() Just having fun, take a breath. |
|
#458
| |||
| |||
| Buddy, can you spare a grant? |
|
#459
| |||
| |||
| Details below from Robert. Thanks for that. |
|
#460
| |||
| |||
| She is the Selkirk Settler and that bit of inclement weather was during a winter north Atlantic trip in 1987 It was nothing unusual for her because she did the North Atlantic winter trips when the Great Lakes were frozen. The pictures of the storm were taken by George Ianiev who was the ship's Second Mate at the time. He has now risen to the rank of Captain. All the best, Robert Gainer |
|
#461
| ||||
| ||||
| Incredible set of photographs. |
|
#462
| ||||
| ||||
| And here's a somewhat dated one to go with the "Alcohol Research" pic... |
|
#463
| |||
| |||
| WWII Boomer "The idea of the rocket U-boat was conceived as early as 1941, at Germany’s top secret rocket research center, Peenemunde. This led to some trials in the summer of 1942 whereby rocket launchers were mounted on the deck U-511, a Type IXC. The Schweres Wurfgerat 41 rocket launcher carried six 30cm Wurfkorper Spreng 42 rockets mounted on the upper deck. The tests were successful, enabling the U-boat to launch rockets both on the surface and when submerged up to a depth of 12 meters (40feet). Donitz expressed interest in the idea as an anti-escort weapon, but further development was hampered by the lack of a suitable guidance system capable of targeting surface ships." http://www.uboataces.com/articles-rocket-uboat.shtml |
|
#464
| ||||
| ||||
| This a good project for Sunday afternoons. You need to click onto it and zoom in a bit |
|
#465
| |||
| |||
| Jack, That's great, I love it!! And it's STOL!! Cheers, Charlie |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
| |
Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Skiff Design Thread | TimClark | Boat Design | 36 | 02-20-2006 06:03 PM |
| Need your help I'm Looking for a picture… | rotorhead | Boat Design | 2 | 12-16-2004 11:44 PM |
| Geek question - can't see thread titles - HELP!!!! | SailDesign | Open Discussion: All Things Boats & Boating | 13 | 11-24-2003 10:03 AM |
| New Forum Thread 1 | duluthboats | Option One | 6 | 05-17-2002 03:24 AM |