Nasa says no global warming

[hoytedow]

Hockey sticks!

[Poida]

Thanks bntii, now you have enlightened me as to where this sham has come from.

Unfortunately most scientists work for the government or rely on government grants for research. This means they do as they are told.

Also if you want to run research or a survey you can conduct in a way that will produce the results that will favour the person who is paying.

So a likely scenario is that the financial institutions that run America realise that they are running out of oil, they needed to find alternative energy but would then put them behind other countries if they continued using oil.

The idea was to ochestrate a scare tactic that would make other countries believe if they kept using oil they would destroy the world.

Or a carbon tax that the dumb prime minister of Australia is trying to introduce, that will slow down our economy.

[kach22i]

Originally Posted by Boston

spencer is the same quack that still writes articles on smoking being good for you

I forgot about that part.

http://www.desmogblog.com/roy-spencer

Spencer and the Heartland Institute

Spencer is listed as an author for the Heartland Institute, a US think tank that has received $676,500 from ExxonMobil since 1998.

The Heartland Institute has also received funding from Big Tobacco over the years and continues to make the claim that "anti-smoking advocates" are exaggerating the health threats of smoking.

[Boston]

yah gotta love the "its all a conspiracy" people. Thats right, hundreds of years of science, thousands of researchers, untold numbers of studies, all one big fat lie.

brilliant isn't it
and all foiled by Poida exposing the hoax

Originally Posted by Poida

Thanks bntii, now you have enlightened me as to where this sham has come from.

Unfortunately most scientists work for the government or rely on government grants for research. This means they do as they are told.

Also if you want to run research or a survey you can conduct in a way that will produce the results that will favour the person who is paying.

So a likely scenario is that the financial institutions that run America realise that they are running out of oil, they needed to find alternative energy but would then put them behind other countries if they continued using oil.

The idea was to ochestrate a scare tactic that would make other countries believe if they kept using oil they would destroy the world.

Or a carbon tax that the dumb prime minister of Australia is trying to introduce, that will slow down our economy.

[Poida]

Now I'm scared Boston.

The bloody CIA will want to silence me. I'm a marked man!!

[Boston]

Dam conspirators ;-)

[hoytedow]

Just hide in plain sight. It took them a decade to find UBL, and he was living in town with TV.

[Boston]

ocean life is dying off much faster than predicted

http://www.canadaeast.com/rss/article/1420451

"The thing is the rate at which we are seeing change now is unprecedented," Rogers said.

"The rate of carbon dioxide emissions is huge compared to the past. The closest comparison we have to our present time is about 55 million years ago and at the moment we're pumping carbon dioxide into the atmosphere at about 10 times the rate at which it was entering the atmosphere during that period, which was associated with a major extinction."

given the annual increase of about 7% in energy use worldwide its safe to suggest a similar increase in CO2 pollution ( not including secondary forcings of course ) means we double our CO2 output about every ten years, so in another ten years we will be increasing the atmospheric CO2 levels at a rate 20 times faster than in the last extinction event. 20 years on and we will be at 40 times faster. Thats just CO2, Methane is fast becoming even more of a problem, 150% increase in atmospheric methane VS only 30% for CO2, and accelerating. All in all not only did Nasa not make any claims denying global climate shift but what claims have been made clearly indicate the impending crisis is here.

[Boston]

Researcher: Fastest Sea-Level Rise In 2 Millennia Linked To Increasing Temperatures; 'A Potentially Disastrous Outcome Of Climate Change'
http://www.underwatertimes.com/news....id=50369874110

[Boston]

'Shocking' state of seas threatens mass extinction, say marine experts
Overfishing and pollution putting fish, sharks and whales in extreme danger – with extinction 'inevitable', study finds
http://www.guardian.co.uk/environmen...inction-threat

[Boston]

"We're talking about losing 50% of species in the next half century - that's faster than any previous mass extinction event - and anybody who thinks we can go through a mass extinction and be perfectly fine is just deluding themselves."

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/science-environment-14344384

[rwatson]

Bring back smoking as an approved and cheap pastime- we need the population reduced really badly, really quickly.

[Deering]

Repeal the Clean Air Act in the U.S. We need more crud in the air blocking sunlight.

[hoytedow]

Biologists on US govt payroll need to quit lying about threats to wildlife.

[Boston]

agreed, they keep insinuating there is a chance we won't loose most wildlife. for once in there pathetic little careers they should quit glossing it over and admit the oceans are already lost, and by the numbers in 20 years every higher terrestrial animal form will qualify for a spot on the UN red list. Your right, ts a whole lot worse than what there letting on.