Boat Design Forums  |  Boat Design Directory  |  Boat Design Gallery  |  Boat Design Book Store  |  Thanks to Our Site Sponsors

Go Back   Boat Design Forums > Community > Open Discussion: All Things Boats & Boating
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #991  
Old 02-12-2012, 12:41 PM
Submarine Tom's Avatar
Submarine Tom Submarine Tom is offline
Mariner
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Rep: 937 Posts: 1,938
Location: North America (not USA and not Mexico but, below the 49th parallel, and on the Pacific coast)
It was posted on one of the other two Concordia threads with some interesting comments.

-Tom
Reply With Quote
  #992  
Old 02-12-2012, 02:05 PM
bntii's Avatar
bntii bntii is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Rep: 1073 Posts: 704
Location: MD
Quote:
Originally Posted by rxcomposite View Post
There is supposed to be a documentary by National Geographic on the Concordia. It was flashed on TV yesterday but missed it today. Anybody got a link?
The show airs tonight:

http://channel.nationalgeographic.co...er_semgngc_122

We are going to watch it.
Reply With Quote
  #993  
Old 02-13-2012, 06:23 PM
hoytedow's Avatar
hoytedow hoytedow is offline
Resistor
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Rep: 1871 Posts: 3,351
Location: Norte de Cuba
Quote:
Originally Posted by rxcomposite View Post
There is supposed to be a documentary by National Geographic on the Concordia. It was flashed on TV yesterday but missed it today. Anybody got a link?
It looks like it plays tonight at 10pm Eastern Time in the U.S.

http://channel.nationalgeographic.co.../schedule/ngc/
__________________
Hoyt
"Lightning is very selective and will not strike crap." Wynand N
"We Redistribute World's Wealth By Climate Policy" UN IPCC Official
Reply With Quote
  #994  
Old 02-14-2012, 11:18 PM
BPL BPL is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Rep: 115 Posts: 154
Location: Midwest US
Safety drills will now legally be conducted before leaving port instead of "within 24 hours"
http://articles.latimes.com/2012/feb...rules-20120213
Reply With Quote
  #995  
Old 02-15-2012, 03:14 AM
BPL BPL is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Rep: 115 Posts: 154
Location: Midwest US
Salvage is a long process.

"The cruise line is considering bids for the ship's removal and is expected to make a decision -- based on method and costs -- in two months, NBC News has learned. Actual removal could take up to 10 months."

http://overheadbin.msnbc.msn.com/_ne...e-up-to-a-year
Reply With Quote
  #996  
Old 02-15-2012, 02:40 PM
pmolsen pmolsen is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Rep: 21 Posts: 0
Location: Sydney
Feedback is sought on any inaccuracies in the 3D animation of the disaster please. In particular on the bow thruster use question.

http://sketchup.google.com/3dwarehou...2b60986ab4327c

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DhwW6FlL9ow
Reply With Quote
  #997  
Old 02-15-2012, 04:03 PM
IEWinkle IEWinkle is offline
Retired Naval Architect
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Rep: 162 Posts: 61
Location: Glasgow
Quote:
Originally Posted by pmolsen View Post
Feedback is sought on any inaccuracies in the 3D animation of the disaster please. In particular on the bow thruster use question.

http://sketchup.google.com/3dwarehou...2b60986ab4327c

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DhwW6FlL9ow
A few comments on your interesting animation.

'In spite of over 100 years of shipbuilding experience sice the Titanic, the outcome was the same. The ship rapidly took on water' but did not sink - she capsized! Deaths were caused by the delay in deploying lifeboats rather than the lack of lifeboats. Although the profession has learned from experience, poor decision making at the scene can cause unnecesary deaths.

Despite the total loss of all power the ship managed to turn through 180 degrees while drifting under the influence of wide and tide and end up at rest on the shore - the captain was unable to control the vessel in any way. If he had been able to he should have beached it bow first onto the shore to maintain stability. Lives were lost because of the grounding and subsequent capsize!

No reference is made to the statements of the engineers after the first few minutes that machinery spaces were flooded as part of 5 flooded watertight compartments even though the ship was only designed for a maximum of 3 adjacent flooded compartments.

Because of this, three of the six generators would have failed almost immediately (just forward of the embedded rock) as would the two propulsion motors (alongside the embedded rock) - the vessel was thus drifting almost from the point of impact (speed slowly falling away from 7 knots). The remaining three seem to have kept going for about 10 minutes (the point of blackout). From this point no steering or thruster power would have been available and the vessel was 'not in command' - despite the statements of the master and crew members - drifting under its own momentum and the combined action of wind on its superstructure and the tidal current on its hull.

Ship abandoned as it started to capsize - about one hour too late with passengers and crew trapped on board by the increasing angle of heel.
Reply With Quote
  #998  
Old 02-15-2012, 05:21 PM
BPL BPL is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Rep: 115 Posts: 154
Location: Midwest US
"The second tank containing 410 cubic metres of fuel was emptied at a speed of eight cubic metres per hour. Emptying of the first six [of 15] tanks of the Costa Concordia will be completed in about three to four days"
http://www.agi.it/english-version/it...cordia_emptied
Reply With Quote
  #999  
Old 02-15-2012, 08:46 PM
BPL BPL is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Rep: 115 Posts: 154
Location: Midwest US
"500,000 gallons of oil was in the tanks of the 114,500 ton ship,
2,300 tonnes of heavy fuel and
200 tonnes of diesel fuel."
http://www.digitaljournal.com/articl...#ixzz1mVciC3Qn
Reply With Quote
  #1000  
Old 02-16-2012, 01:35 AM
powerabout powerabout is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Rep: 484 Posts: 1,429
Location: Melbourne/Singapore/Italy
I wonder if the cruise ship industry will be paying carbon tax just like the airline industry?

( maybe it should be mining tax?)
__________________
Boat builders are not necessarily Boat designers who are not necessarily Engineers who are not builders who are not designers.....
Reply With Quote
  #1001  
Old 02-16-2012, 01:38 AM
powerabout powerabout is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Rep: 484 Posts: 1,429
Location: Melbourne/Singapore/Italy
Quote:
Originally Posted by peter radclyffe View Post
the findings from the ships black box have been released,just before the crash the captain is clearly heard saying,

its time to put a reef in
excellent!
__________________
Boat builders are not necessarily Boat designers who are not necessarily Engineers who are not builders who are not designers.....
Reply With Quote
  #1002  
Old 02-16-2012, 02:54 AM
NorCal's Avatar
NorCal NorCal is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Rep: 10 Posts: 14
Location: California
Quote:
Originally Posted by powerabout View Post
I wonder if the cruise ship industry will be paying carbon tax just like the airline industry?

( maybe it should be mining tax?)
If the fuel was purchased in the EU the price reflects the price of carbon in the EU ETS. An additional carbon tax would be extraneous. Guess they included aviation which hits the airlines or more appropriately the passengers twice.
Reply With Quote
  #1003  
Old 02-16-2012, 11:08 AM
RonL RonL is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Rep: 10 Posts: 83
Location: Central Texas
Apologies to anyone that may have already posted this possibility of how the damage took place.
A similar event in my past (no collision, but an extremely close call) leads my vision of mind to consider the huge displacement of the ship as it passed close to the outcrops appearing above water.
The fins are extended, but not damaged, this suggest a fast swing of the stern into the rocky outcrop, a corrective action that likely was not required (a knee jerk reaction may have taken place ?) is the hard to starboard move.

The ships huge displacement would cause a river of flow between the two outcrops, as the majority of the ships volume is forward and moving away from the outer of the two rocky masses, there would be a tremendous pull of this water flow to be added to the power of the ship making this turn action.

Just my theory, for what it might be worth.

RonL
Reply With Quote
  #1004  
Old 02-17-2012, 02:44 AM
michael pierzga michael pierzga is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Rep: 670 Posts: 2,457
Location: spain
Local high speed ferry did a " COSTA" last night. Not sure if it was a drive by to wave at friends, football game GOAL !!! or Iphone error that caused the crash

Looks like if youre gonna do a Costa, its safer with a multi hull. Not much damage and the ferry is securely parked with no capsize threat. .
Attached Thumbnails
Last voyage for Costa Concordia cruise ship-park.jpg  Last voyage for Costa Concordia cruise ship-park-1.jpg  Last voyage for Costa Concordia cruise ship-park2.jpg  

Reply With Quote
  #1005  
Old 02-17-2012, 04:11 AM
BPL BPL is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Rep: 115 Posts: 154
Location: Midwest US
The Maverick Dos reminds me of the ferry perched on top of a building after the Japanese tsunami.
Reply With Quote
Reply



Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
help with cruise ship jobs james1911 Services & Employment 2 02-08-2012 06:28 PM
Cruise Ship Stability Willallison Stability 10 02-09-2005 02:09 PM
Cruise Ship Project cruiserbrain Boat Design 0 03-26-2004 07:16 PM
Need help with cruise ship mathematical formulas cmc Boat Design 4 12-11-2003 11:30 PM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:48 PM.


Powered by: vBulletin Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Web Site Design and Content Copyright ©1999 - 2012 Boat Design Net