Global Warming? are humans to blame?

[hoytedow]

Originally Posted by Boston

obviously there is a slight disparity between production and use

Oh, no! It's the hockey on a stick again! We must all now surrender to Boston's superior intellect!

Come over to the dark side.

[Boston]

well at least I can see that a hockey stick doesn't have a handle that looks like ~~~~~~

[Boston]

I believe your referring to Mann's original best polynomial fit of temp in the northern hemisphere.




which when averaged throughout the temp data pool of that time period ends up looking like this



Kinda hard to deny an increasing temp trend there now isn't it Hoyt ole bean

[Bamby]

Chicken Little besides running around shouting the "Sky is Falling" which we've heard over and over again. How about proposing something realistic and meaningful that can actually be done about it..

[hoytedow]

It's all horse hockey just the same.

[Yobarnacle]

Creating an ideology pegged to carbon dioxide is a dangerous nonsense…The present
alarm on climate change is an instrument of social control, a pretext for major
businesses and political battle. It became an ideology

[hoytedow]

There's nothing you can do about it except ruin this fine land.

[Yobarnacle]

for the last time i quit. i dont argue with fence posts.

[Boston]

Originally Posted by Boston

speaking of which your opinion that "its a scam" remains unsubstantiated.

CO2 is a greenhouse gas
it is the result of an exothermic reaction
excess amounts in the atmosphere can be trace directly the burning of fossil fuels
global warming is undoubtedly the result of this process.

what parts a scam and what scientific evidence do you have to support that opinion

none would be my guess

which is why in your next post you will ignore the question and fail to produce one shred of peer reviewed work on topic

well I hit that nail right on the head now didn't I

Bamby, thats what the other thread is for, this ones to enlighten the deniers, and entertain the readers. Hows it working

Hoyt, something tells me you've a lot of road apples at your disposal, cause from way over hear you certainly appear full of something .

interesting, I wonder if you folks realize what your behavior must appear like to the readers

refusing to use peer reviewed citation. Insisting on ambiguous denial, while avoiding any discussion of even the most basic science one might have learned even in grade school.

Sorry peeps but your clinging to your denial with a death grip, and its not pretty

[Boston]

Originally Posted by Yobarnacle

for the last time i quit. i dont argue with fence posts.

You seem to do a lot of quitting, when, I wonder did you quit thinking rationally about such a simple subject. The basics of chemistry mate, we are talking about nothing but the basics.

CO2 is caused by the burning of fossil fuels, and we burn a lot of fossil fuels.

CO2 is a greenhouse gas, and we now have more CO2 than previously because we burn a lot of fossil fuels

now whats so hard about that realization eh.

but I'm the fence post

and you prefer to think I'm the delusional one

RIIIIIIIIIIIGHT

[Yobarnacle]

1+1=3?
Whered you go to school.
What I think is , If it looks like dung, smells like dung, behaves like dung, then, its a load of crap

[Boston]

Originally Posted by Boston

yet you insist 1+1=3

again your having trouble with basic comprehension

The example of 1+1=3 is a euphemism for your insistence that the combustion process does not produce CO2. We know it does, yet you deny all the science behind Rapid Global Climate Shift. Of which the combustion process is an integral part.

Clearly your afraid to discuss the science lest your death grip on denial be greased with a few realities, wouldn't want to slip and fall now would you.

The fear is obvious

the truth is equally so

[Boston]

I thought you'd quit not that I want anyone to quit but still its kinda telling about your basic thought process when you threaten to leave over and over yet stay, only to blindly continue the denial. Which I find an excellent opportunity to show the readers just how ridiculous the deniers position is

The combustion process produces CO2 as a byproduct

its the most basic of chemistry and a very well established very simple fact

you might want to look into it before you claim all the science behind Climate Shift is somehow flawed.

chew on that for a while, I'm off for a cup of Joe

[Yobarnacle]

eres tan coriente. Pinche indio, eres hombres como tu crear mal reputacion para todos los indios. eres obstinado pendejo sin igual. Sabes?

[Boston]

which again fails to address your denial in any credible way

you clearly stated that in your opinion the science behind climate shift is somehow flawed. I asked you what part and you said, all. OK so lets start at the beginning

we burn fossil fuels

the combustion process results in a byproduct of CO2.

any problems so far?