| ||||
|
#31
| |||
| |||
| You seem to forget Americas debt --its so big I don't know what it is any more. You want to pay for it go ahead and thanks But until space travel becomes easy then there is not much point for a yet undiscovered asteroid. What about discovered cancer. If cancer was an invading country you would have cured it by now. |
|
#32
| ||||
| ||||
| Are you kidding? They knew what satellites meant and they also knew the implications of ballistic delivery systems. So did we and the race wasn't so much into space as to who had "imported" or a better word; confiscated, the superior Nazi scientists. Fortunately, the USA and other western societies where much more desirable, understandably so, particularly in comparison to the USSR's "acquisition" of similar scientists. In short, we had them come freely and some where softly enticed, while they (the USSR) frankly captured them, locked them up and told them their families would be safe, so long as they did what they where told. I remember the era and know it well, how about you? The USSR did very little but play catch up with our technology, mostly by stealing it from us and other friendly nations. You see the thing is, when you have a set of leaders that stifle innovation and possably annihilate huge sections of intellectuals, literally killing off entire generations of the brightest minds, like Stalin did, you pretty much have to play catch up or steal your technological advances, as best as you can. This is why they had to play catch up, during the entire cold war. Every step they took, was met with a huge advance they now had to over come, as our response to it. The first to cross the Atlantic didn't end the race, nor the first to circumnavigate, nor the first into space. This is just the first and they (the USSR) get some credit in this regard, but their space program is a joke and always has been. Hell, they're still using the same technology, they stole and incorporated into their 1960's era rockets. Yep, real advanced. This isn't a debate you want to have, if you don't know the Soviet space program. Particularly in light of the Proton attempts to beat us to the moon, with some sort of mission. Their success rates, looked like our success rates of our Atlas during the late 50's. They were desperate to have a political trump (common ploy for them) and they blew up, crashed and left helpless in orbit, about a dozen attempts leading up to the July '69 landing of Apollo 11. Now they did eventually get a lander up there, but the information gathers was already known from the Apollo missions and previous unmanned soft landings in the mid 60's. As to the benefit of space programs, most of the materials and products you use, are directly or indirectly related to research in this very industry. Plastics and other man made materials were costly to developed and often sponsored by grants, from these space related programs. They weren't developed so someone could produce a kitchen blender at half the weight, but to provide a bracket (etc.) that was light enough to be considered on some space bound device. After the material was developed, of course a marketing team devised ways to further recoup development funds and naturally corporate profits, hence the blender body. As to American dept, maybe you should do a Google search and see what the GDP is related to their dept, for the top 20 countries of the world, then try and make that argument. You'll find countries in quite good standing, with much larger dept burdens and again, maybe you should speak what you actually know, instead of the fluff from tabloid headlines. |
|
#33
| |||
| |||
| Cant we all just say well done to a great achievement and forget all this nationalism crap "were better than you" "no these guys did this first" "well we did that first", Pretty sure your all way ahead of us down here in Australia ![]() Well done everyone involved in the Mars landing, how long till man (or woman) walks on Mars? DAVE |
|
#34
| |||
| |||
| Quote:
Well it wont be an Aussie because we are better to do this than you |
|
#35
| |||
| |||
| Quote:
40 years? We don't hear much about the international space station recently. I hope Curiosity elevates popular enthusiasm again into space exploration. |
|
#36
| |||
| |||
| Quote:
It took Viking 1 (1976) – 335 days Viking 2 (1976) – 360 days Mars Reconnaissance Orbiter (2006) – 210 days Phoenix Lander (2008) – 295 days Curiosity Lander (2012) – 253 days http://www.universetoday.com/14841/h...o-get-to-mars/ |
|
#37
| |||
| |||
| Correct, I was thinking something else. |
|
#38
| |||
| |||
| Quote:
__________________ Hoyt The TITANIC sank because it had a hole in it(still does). Submarine Tom You just can't put too much info on your patterns. DGreenwood |
|
#39
| |||
| |||
| Quote:
__________________ Hoyt The TITANIC sank because it had a hole in it(still does). Submarine Tom You just can't put too much info on your patterns. DGreenwood |
|
#40
| |||
| |||
| Quote:
![]() http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Muchea_Tracking_Station http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Island_...acking_Station http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Honeysu...acking_Station http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Carnarvon_Tracking_Station http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cooby_C...acking_Station http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Orroral...acking_Station http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Canberr...cation_Complex
__________________ Hoyt The TITANIC sank because it had a hole in it(still does). Submarine Tom You just can't put too much info on your patterns. DGreenwood |
|
#41
| |||
| |||
| And let us not forget Spain's involvement. Thanks. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Madrid_...cation_Complex
__________________ Hoyt The TITANIC sank because it had a hole in it(still does). Submarine Tom You just can't put too much info on your patterns. DGreenwood |
|
#42
| ||||
| ||||
| There are lots of folks and countries to be grateful for, as adventures such as these can't be done without their help. |
|
#43
| |||
| |||
| Quote:
Who am I to argue ![]() But in all seriousness I wasnt around for the moon landing (born in 84) but I hope I'm around for man walking on Mars, my Mum still talks about leaving school early to go and watch Armstrong strutting his stuff, and I hope my generation gets a memory like that DAVE |
|
#44
| ||||
| ||||
| I still remember the event like it was last week. What's really interesting and those who saw the actual live feed (from Australia BTW, as it's receivers where pointing at the moon at the time) may remember, the feed came to the USA inverted, for the first few seconds, before someone caught it and quickly flipped a switch to invert the image. Armstrong's foot appeared from the bottom of the screen and reached up to the first step, then the image got flipped. My younger brother (who never was too bright) asked if they were on the bottom of the moon, thinking this would explain quite a bit. |
|
#45
| ||||
| ||||
| the most amazing thing for me in space exploration was when apollo 13 ran into trouble and how they recovered it. i think it was 13.
__________________ brendan . |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
| |
Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| About landing crafts | karayelhb | Boat Design | 111 | 03-17-2013 12:00 AM |
| How to get to Mars, VERY Cool Video | brian eiland | Open Discussion: All Things Boats & Boating | 4 | 10-01-2012 01:07 PM |
| New Landing Craft | GTO | Boat Design | 2 | 08-11-2012 07:47 PM |
| Taking off and landing | Marvout | Multihulls | 5 | 10-12-2010 06:21 AM |
| The Landing School | Education | 2 | 06-02-2002 08:31 AM | |