Boat Design Forums  |  Boat Design Directory  |  Boat Design Gallery  |  Boat Design Book Store  |  Thanks to Our Site Sponsors

Go Back   Boat Design Forums > Community > Open Discussion: All Things Boats & Boating
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1  
Old 05-16-2006, 07:42 AM
dereksireci's Avatar
dereksireci dereksireci is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Rep: 37 Posts: 163
Location: South Carolina
Avoidable collision

Came across this on the hull truth.
Watch it.

http://www.m90.org/index.php?id=11568

In my opinion the position of the Coast Guard boat made it the burdened vessel and they should have yielded to the speedboat. In any case they are required to make all attempts to avoid collision. It appears that the Coast Guard captain's attempts to avoid collision were limited to yelling at the other boat, which were ineffective at least.

Would love to hear Ike chime in on this.

Thoughts?

djs
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 05-16-2006, 09:15 AM
SheetWise's Avatar
SheetWise SheetWise is offline
All Beach -- No Water.
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Rep: 574 Posts: 273
Location: Phoenix
Technically right or wrong, that collision was inexcusable -- from the cameras perspective it only took about 2 seconds to see it was a collision course.
__________________
Time is Gods way to keep everything from happening at once.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 05-16-2006, 06:10 PM
marshmat's Avatar
marshmat marshmat is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Rep: 1958 Posts: 4,114
Location: Ontario
Under Canadian regs (I believe US are similar), the Coast Guard boat was the 'give-way' vessel and should have slowed or changed course. Canadian law would put 100% fault on the captain of the Coast Guard boat.
The captain of the speedboat should have seen the CG boat, he certainly shouldn't have been surprised, but he was in the CG's green sector and was obligated to hold his course regardless.
The 'cumbersome-vessel' custom, by which smaller craft give way to big unmanoeuverable craft, does not apply as both boats here are of similar agility.
Canadian law does not exempt Coast Guard craft from the colregs. Does US law provide such an exemption?
(PS- What kind of idiot thinks that yelling over the engines of two powerboats is at all audible? Use the horn!)
__________________
- Matt Marsh - Marsh Design (small craft blog and designs)
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 05-16-2006, 08:48 PM
Ike's Avatar
Ike Ike is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Rep: 1356 Posts: 1,371
Location: Washington
My internet link is really bad today and I can't get it to download the video
__________________
Ike
"Don't tell me that I can't. Tell me how I can!"
New Boatbuilders Home Page
Boat Builder News Blog
My Boating Safety Blog
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 05-16-2006, 09:20 PM
longliner45 longliner45 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Rep: 505 Posts: 1,637
Location: Ohio
me either,,,,,,,longliner
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 05-16-2006, 10:13 PM
Ike's Avatar
Ike Ike is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Rep: 1356 Posts: 1,371
Location: Washington
well, I downloaded it and it kept freezing after about 20 seconds or so.
__________________
Ike
"Don't tell me that I can't. Tell me how I can!"
New Boatbuilders Home Page
Boat Builder News Blog
My Boating Safety Blog
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 05-16-2006, 10:21 PM
StianM's Avatar
StianM StianM is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2006
Rep: 114 Posts: 577
Location: Norway
I think it's international law that the one coming from right hand side (stb) is the one that has all rights. How mutch work was it for the dude that runn this vesel to just slow down a litle? A planing hull drop quite fast in speed and just two kn diference would alow him to pas behind. Don't hold on your right, you newer know what kind off beople you can runn into. Wonder if those guys in the speed boat will get a fat compensation$$$$$

What a jerk! Reminds me off a joke about about a american flight carier witch spoted a object on it's radar and the captan grab the VHF and ask undentfied vesel please change course, but the reply was we wont change cource you have to change yourself. The captain repeated this one off USA's flight cariers, please move or we will runn over and sink you and the folowing reply was, you move because we are a lighthouse
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 05-17-2006, 12:01 AM
Ike's Avatar
Ike Ike is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Rep: 1356 Posts: 1,371
Location: Washington
Of course it's international law. The Navigation rules are the same worldwide.

Not having looked at the video, judging from what has been said here;

if a collision occured between a Coast Guard vessel and a recreational boat, then there will be a Coast Guard investigation and an NTSB (National Transportation Safety Board.) investigation. If the Coast Guard was at fault there will more than likely be a Court Martial. This is serious stuff. The Boat Coxswain will more than likely lose his small boat qualification, which is not a small thing, and more than likely lose a stripe, which means a reduction in pay. If negligence is involved it could be worse. It also means he will probably get transfered somewhere where he will not be working on boats, more than likely to a ship. He aslo may ended with a General Dischage or even a Bad Conduct Discharge. This is not a little thing. Either one of those is a less than Honorable Discharge which can bar him from many occupations in the civilian world.

This comes under Hazarding a US Vessel which would cost an officer his career, an enlisted man probably a reduction in rate. Also Damaging Goverment Property, for which he may have to pay restitution, and that doesn't even start on damages to the other vessel. The Coast Guard will have to pay damages and restitution, medical costs if anyone was hurt and will more than likely get sued anyway.

On the other hand, if the civilian is at fault the most he would get would be a $1000.00 fine unless they can prove Grossly Negligent Operation which is a felony and can result in a $5000 and one year jail time. Rarely is Grossly negligent charged or proved and it has to handled by the US Attorney. The $1000 fine sounds like lot but it's an administrative penalty assessed by the Coast Guard not a Federal Court so it doesn't go on your record.

The last time this happened (in 2000 I think) the Coast Guard got really slammed. I don't know what happened to the Coxswain but I'd be willing to bet he's not operating boats anymore and probably isn't in the Coast Guard anymore.
__________________
Ike
"Don't tell me that I can't. Tell me how I can!"
New Boatbuilders Home Page
Boat Builder News Blog
My Boating Safety Blog
Reply With Quote
Reply



Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
boat collision fcfc Boat Design 7 02-04-2006 10:31 PM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:43 PM.


Powered by: vBulletin Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Web Site Design and Content Copyright ©1999 - 2012 Boat Design Net